What parts of of the narrative are like 2+2=5 to you?
From me the actual fictions were these:
- Saddam Hussein was partly or wholly responsible for the 9-11 attacks
- Iraq had weapons of mass destruction
- The USA needed to invade Iraq in order to prevent future attacks
The Terror they pretended to fight never existed, this is the 2+2=5. You can't imagine how much damage could do any random people in the West in a single day, with primitive tools. Yet there have never been a large scale sabotage or destruction, only a few catastrophic events that normal people could not pull out without tech and intel help . . .
Also because muslims don't need it, since in Europe they are going to prevail simply by sheer demographics and do not wish to be accused of such atrocities while silently achieving it.
The PTB firstly need to create confusion, so people can't have a clear view or a strong opinion on what's going on; then they provide a narrative to resolve the confusion. Then perpetuate the narrative with periodical supposed new evidence while continuously repeating the same mantra.
And they succeeded, since seems settled that 9/11 was an attack against amarican imperialism and globalism, while in reality it's been an attack by the globalists (sacrificing one of their symbols and playing the part of the victim) against the american people, with the following Patriot Act and more.